









 | |
TWELFTH MEETING OF THE
COUNCIL
Lancashire Record Office, Monday 18 March 2002 at 2.00pm
Present: Jim Grisenthwaite, (ACALG), Chairman
Marian Hewitt (Film Archive Forum)
Bruce Jackson (Society of Archivists, NW Region), Secretary
Kevin Mulley (Greater Manchester Archivists Group)
Lesley Owen-Edwards (BAC)
Jonathan Pepler (NW County Archivists Group), Treasurer
Brenda Smith (Federation of Family History Societies)
David Stoker (Merseyside Archivists Group),);.
Ian Taylor (NW Museums Service)
Janice Taylor (NW Regional Archives Development Officer)
Frances Thomson (CURL and NW Regional Library System)
Caroline Williams (LUCAS)
1 Apologies for absence
Alan Crosby (BALH), John Gurney (HMC); Richard Hoyle (Royal Historical
Society); Chris Lewis (BRA); Colin Phillips (co-opted); Catherine Redfern
(PRO); Dawn Routledge (NCA Archive Development Officer)
The chairman (JG) welcomed Lesley Owen-Edwards (LOD), Senior
Archivist at Unilever Historical Archives, who was attending her first meeting
as representative of the Business Archivers Council (BAC). The name of the
future representative of SCONUL is not yet known.
2 Minutes and Matters arising
The minutes of the meeting of 4 February were agreed as a correct record.
The following matters arising were raised:
Item 2 (Point 4) The post of Director of Libraries NW had now been
filled, and the appointee should be in post by 1 April.
Item 3 The Regional Archive strategy was now available on the website.
No comments had yet been sent to Janice Taylor (JT) about the content
of future seminars.
Item 6.2 . JT will write to the Offices in the NW region who had
participated in the last National User Survey for their agreement for their
results to be released for to the RAC in a structured regional form.
Item 7.5 £80,000 had been allocated by Resource for the study to be
carried out, and it was due to be completed by the end of the year. Margaret
Turner would be leading the project, with Sheffield University carrying out
the research.
Item 9.1 Bruce Jackson (BJ) had responded to the Bury Heritage
Plan on behalf of the RAC.
Item 9.2 The Regional White paper had not yet appeared. There were
rumours that it might be delayed for several months.
Item 9.7 An initial meeting had been held at the NW Sound Archive at
Clitheroe to discuss the options for extending its operations throughout the
Region. A paper will be brought to the RAC later in the Spring. Similar issues
will need to be addressed in the context of regional film archive provision.
NW Vision will be a key body in any discussions, and there is a possibility of
a funded study being carried out. Some money was already available for
Merseyside, including a contribution form NW Arts. A national conference on
Film material to be held in October by the Film Archive Federation will now
also cover Sound Archives.
3 Single Regional
Agency for the North West
3.1 Progress on formation.
JG reported that there was a great
deal of activity taking place. Resource had responded to proposed NW SRA
Business Plan (copy of letter appended to the minutes) with a series of
points. A delegation from the Region, comprising JG, Ian Taylor (IT)
and David Lightfoot of Libraries North West, had met with Resource on 13 March
to clarify these issues (notes of the meeting appended to the minutes).
Resource have now issued a set of "Golden Rules" which all SRAs
should meet. They are happy with the proposed vision for the NW SRA, but
regard the ratio of staff cost/project costs as too high. More detailed
staffing and budget proposals have to be submitted to Resource by 1 Nov 2002,
and decisions on funding for 2003/04 will be given by the end of the year.
Budget monitoring of all SRAs will be more rigorous than had previously been
foreseen to ensure compliance with Resource policies. The NW SRA is still
envisaged to come in to being on 1 April 2003, but will not be fully staffed
by that date, with "fitting-out" taking place in the following
months.
3.2 Transitional Constitutional Arrangements
In constitutional terms, the existing NW Museums Service will transform
into the SRA. The draft constitution in the form of Memorandum and Articles of
Association (copy appended to the minutes) is virtually standard for all
regions, and has been developed by solicitors on behalf of Resource.
Clarification is still awaited on the position of the Isle of Man (and of the
Channel Islands) from Resource. The statement in the Objects that the SRA
activities would relate to museums, libraries and archives "which are
either public or from which the public may benefit" was noted. Resource
now require all three domains in each region to agree the draft Constitution,
before development begins of regulations/byelaws which will deal with such
matters as the structures of the Boards, which can vary between regions. The
NW SRA byelaws will then need to be approved by the Board of NWMS, which will
then need to seek approval of an EGM to adopt the new Constitution and Bylews.
This process will also include a start date for the new SRA (intended for 1
April 2003). If all approved, then the new business plan, recruitment etc can
be begun.
Jonathan Pepler (JP) proposed that the RAC formally approve the draft
Memorandum and Articles of Association, and this was seconded by Kevin Mulley (KM).
The motion was agreed unanimously
There was discussion about how the NWMS Board would transform into the SRA.
Originally the idea had been that a "shadow" SRA would be formed, but
it is now suggested that it would be less complicated for the NWMS Board to be
expanded. This could be done by co-option, so would be straight-forward. A paper
is to be prepared for NWMS Board in late June on this issue.
3.3 Year 2002/03
Resource have indicated that they will make £689,000 of core funding
available to NWMS for year 2002/03, so the estimates in the draft Business plan
for NWMS for the year will have to be reduced. Of the £232000 of this sum which
is for grants, Resource require a reasonable proportion to be (ring-fenced"
to cross-sectoral projects, and it has been agreed that one third will be
allocated to these. Resource also insist that the grants be seen as being at
least partly from "project "funding. All or part of RLASU costs are to
be included in core funding.
There is also scope to bid for "project funding" to a combined
total (including core) of £1.044M. A list of priority projects will be
prepared by NWMS staff and JT over the next few weeks for submission
to Resource. Any money uncommitted at the end of the year will be carried
over as an addition to the 2003/04 budget. There will be some changes to the
VAT status of the Area Museums Services, which mean that not all VAT will be
recoverable, and this will have a negative effect on the budget.
The required changes to the 2002/03 budget had been reported to the NWMS
Board meeting on 15 March, when they were approved.
KM asked about the grants available in 2002/03. IT stated that
the grant policy would be distributed before Easter, and will go to archives
and libraries in addition to museums (a draft of the letter to be circulated
is appended to the minutes). A registered museum with membership of NWMS
would be an essential partner is all bids, and would need to complete the
application form and handle the grant money. There was discussion about how
the appropriateness and standards of potential archive partners could be
dealt with in the absence of an equivalent of museum registration, and it
was agreed that the JT as the Archive Development Officer would
provide guidance on services. IT stated that NWMS intended to carry
out a review of grants and their effectiveness in year 2002/03, similar to a
review recently carried out by NEMLAC. It was unlikely that the future
cross-sectoral grants policy would be identical to the existing one for
museums.
4 Regional Archive Strategy
JT reported that there had been 3 response to the press release on
the launch of the strategy, which she felt was good. On investigation, print
costs for a reprint of the main strategy document were prohibitive so she
had produced a one sheet summary document which she circulated. JP
felt that this was a very useful step, as it would allow wider distribution
of the key information.
The scheduled Collections Development seminar in February had been
postponed due to difficulties over speakers, and was now taking place on 21
May. A seminar on Access would be held on 15 April. JT felt that a seminar on
Records Management would be useful, and there was general agreement about
this. It was important to try to reach the non-archival audience for this, and
information distribution would need to be done carefully. It was suggested
that the NWRDA might be interested in this. There was discussion about
including a Freedom of Information (FOI) element in the programme, which may
well have an impact not only on public bodies, but also those who do business
with them. Data Protection might also be an appropriate theme.
JT is preparing project briefs for A2A and the Logjam projects
identified as priorities in the Regional Strategy, and would be seeking
funding from Resource/NWMS towards these (see 3.3 above). KM inquired
if there was any possibility of funding might be available to assist some of
the smaller repositories to participate in the next National Visitor Survey. JT
hoped to secure some funding towards this, as the fuller collection of data
would be beneficial.
5 A2A progress, and second round bids
JP said there was nothing really to report on "Our Mutual
Friends in the North". Material was now appearing on the website, and
marked-up lists were being returned to participating offices to facilitate
checking. A second draw-down of £21,00 was about to be submitted. There was
some discussion of how it was to be launched, with funds being available to
employ a consultant. The Project Management Board will be looking at launch
proposals.
JT reported that work was progressing on the preparation of the main
regional 2nd round bid – provisionally titled "Mills,
Mansions and Cornershops". Over 20 repositories were involved, with about
56000 pages of catalogues for conversion. Already £2500 had been committed by
Resource and £900 by the Business Archive Council. At present the Project
Team are still working up the bid, which will then be sent to the Archive
Lottery Advisor for comment. It is thought that a team of 4 should be
appointed to carry out the marking-up etc. Final cost per page is still
unclear, as this will depend on external funding, such as that discussed
above. Overall project costs are likely to be about £172000.
Other bids from individual archive services are likely, such as that form
GMCRO for the catalogue of the Documentary Photographic Archive.
6 Regional Issues
6.1 Regional Consultative Consortium. JG continued to attend
this on behalf of the rAC, but at the moment there was nothing to report.
The annual conference involving archivists and academic users had taken
place at Edge Hill on 25 January with over 60 attending. The event had gone
well, and much of the content was very useful. It was suggested that future
events might be held at a different time of year as changes to semester
patterns had now made late January more difficult in many institutions. It
was also suggested that the event be more widely advertised – to include,
for example, university and academic libraries. Wider involvement and
participation form academics was to be encouraged.
6.2 LUCAS. Caroline Williams (CW) reported that LUCAS had been
commissioned by Resource to carry out a "Snapshot Diagnostic of
information collected in the Archive Domain" by May. Similar exercises
were being conducted in the Library and Museum domains.
6.3 HLF Regional Offices. There was discussion of the up-coming
re-location of the Heritage Lottery Fund Regional offices to within the
regions. The precise stage of development in the NW was unclear. It appeared
that HLF were looking to be more involved in outreach and bid development.
- Resource
7.1 BJ reported that it now looked likely that Resource would
continue to provide limited funding to the RACs until 2004 (or the
establishment of the SRA, whichever was sooner). This would be distributed
through the NCA, and would probably be at the same level as in the last two
years.
7.2 JG reported on the current status of the "Renaissance in
the Regions" report, and its possible funding. The process of seeking
applications from possible regional museum "hubs" was now well under
way, and decision were likely by early summer. The financial position would
not be clearer until the autumn.
- Budget report
JP reported verbally that there was a balance of about £2700 after payment
of bills.
- Any Other Business
- BJ reported that RAC Chairmen and Archive Development Officers would all
be invited to the Parliamentary event organised by NCA to take place on 22
April. All MPs and members of the Lords would be invited, and supplied with
targeted information based on their region/locality.
- There was a brief discussion of issues arising from the proposed changes
affecting Civil Registration records. If they were given Public Records
status this may create problems in some areas.
- KM
asked about the current status of the ACALG benchmarking document
circulated at the ACALG AGM. Several present had attended the meeting and said
that the status of the document was still unclear.
- IT
noted that NWMS had now involved JT in the process of commenting on
archival bids to HLF (a role NWMS already carried out). He suggested that it
might be appropriate to draft some basic guidelines, which was generally felt
to be useful.
Date and time of next meeting
The next meeting will be held at Lancashire Record Office on Monday
13 May at 2.00pm
BJ/20/03/02
|